Sort:
08-14-2008 at 1:06 PM
arobertson...
Not Ranked
Joined on 10-11-2007
Florida
31,372 Points
arobertson25 is not online. Last active: 07-02-2009, 3:06 PMBronze

the new stimulus check

What is this all about?  I will admit I was not a fan of the first one but, we did need the money and it went to good use.  I am afraid to ask where the second round of money is going to becoming from and how much are we suppose to get.




url=http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker][/url]
Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Food Diary 
08-14-2008 at 1:08 PM
RachaelNic...
Not Ranked
Joined on 02-23-2007
North Dakota
89,097 Points
RachaelNicole is not online. Last active: 07-04-2009, 3:49 PMSilver
I have not heard of a second stimulus check.


Our baby boy at 20 weeks.............Our other baby, Gizmo

31 week belly pic

My Bio ~ BFP Chart ~ My Blog

 Pregnancy Ticker 
08-14-2008 at 1:11 PM
arobertson...
Not Ranked
Joined on 10-11-2007
Florida
31,372 Points
arobertson25 is not online. Last active: 07-02-2009, 3:06 PMBronze
It was very brief. They are still talking about it Nancy Pelosi was on the View last week talking about it.  I missed everything but the last 2 seconds of it.




url=http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker][/url]
Created by MyFitnessPal.com - Free Food Diary 
08-14-2008 at 1:16 PM
MrsJA
Not Ranked
Joined on 06-07-2006
Knoxville, TN
32,867 Points
MrsJA is not online. Last active: 07-01-2009, 10:50 AMBronze
I dont' think anything is official yet, but seems to me that a 2nd check would be issued as a way to "buy votes" in November.
08-14-2008 at 1:18 PM
spritz
Not Ranked
Joined on 07-19-2006
Missouri
4,723 Points
spritz is not online. Last active: 07-04-2009, 10:02 AMNewbie

The Democrats in Congress are pushing a second round of stimulus checks.  They've been talking about it for a coule of months now.  However, it doesn't seem to be getting very much media attention.  Here's an article about it:

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=cqmidday-000002931358

 

It's a little old (July 31), but you get the idea.

 
08-14-2008 at 1:22 PM
Mikes_Wife...
Top 150 Contributor
Joined on 08-03-2006
Erie, PA
170,785 Points
Mikes_Wife06 is not online. Last active: 07-02-2009, 3:23 PMGold
I don't believe that any of the details have been finalized as of yet.
08-14-2008 at 1:23 PM
JulieF
Not Ranked
Joined on 04-28-2007
Ohio
37,784 Points
JulieF is not online. Last active: 07-04-2009, 4:19 PMBronze
It's really dumb.  This came out a few weeks ago.  Obama proposed taxing the oil companies and giving $1000 each to every "working family."  Or every family, I am not sure which.

Newsweek, 1971, “Ronald Reagan’s Slow Fade,” ended with the judgment that “the somber truth is that Sacramento may mark the end of Ronald Reagan’s political road. . . By every normal measure, Ronald Reagan ought to be entitled to any political future he wants. A close aide said, 'The Presidency? Oh, he’s not interested. Four more years and I think you’ll see Ronald Reagan riding one of his horses off into the sunset.'” And see Stephen Roberts in the New York Times Magazine: “In 1976, the reasoning goes, Reagan would be 65, and too old to run.” “When a guy’s built on celluloid,” Democratic State Senator George Moscone said, “he goes up fast, but he burns out quickly.”

After the 1976 campaign, Newsweek offered a reprise, “Into the Sunset": "The concluding line of Reagan’s convention speech—'There is no substitute for victory'—could also turn out to be a epitaph for his own political career."

And not to be left out, John Coyne wrote in some magazine called National Review that "Reagan seems somewhat out of step with the new political stirrings, a man very much of the Sixties. . . For a decade he has been a central symbol of everything that is best in what we call the conservative movement, and if his approach and his ideas are obsolete, then so are those many of us who believe in him. And it’s never much fun to be a middle-aged anachronism." (NR) 
08-14-2008 at 1:32 PM
ms.c.seatt...
Not Ranked
Joined on 02-10-2007
Hoboken
22,068 Points
ms.c.seattle is not online. Last active: 06-01-2009, 5:17 AMBronze
I love Obama, but am I a working family? Do non-working families not need the money? If DH and I file separately do we each get a grand? I am not a big fan of stimulus checks...but I wont turn down the cash.

 
08-14-2008 at 1:36 PM
JulieF
Not Ranked
Joined on 04-28-2007
Ohio
37,784 Points
JulieF is not online. Last active: 07-04-2009, 4:19 PMBronze

I don't really care if I get the money or not.  I don't spend it in the way that the government hopes it's spent; I just put mine into savings.  I think they want it to be spent immediately.  Yeah, that's a really great idea.  There' s a huge problem with spending more than what you have, so let's advocate frivolous spending.

I also frown at government taking away from a private industry based on its subjective view of what "excessive profits" are.


Newsweek, 1971, “Ronald Reagan’s Slow Fade,” ended with the judgment that “the somber truth is that Sacramento may mark the end of Ronald Reagan’s political road. . . By every normal measure, Ronald Reagan ought to be entitled to any political future he wants. A close aide said, 'The Presidency? Oh, he’s not interested. Four more years and I think you’ll see Ronald Reagan riding one of his horses off into the sunset.'” And see Stephen Roberts in the New York Times Magazine: “In 1976, the reasoning goes, Reagan would be 65, and too old to run.” “When a guy’s built on celluloid,” Democratic State Senator George Moscone said, “he goes up fast, but he burns out quickly.”

After the 1976 campaign, Newsweek offered a reprise, “Into the Sunset": "The concluding line of Reagan’s convention speech—'There is no substitute for victory'—could also turn out to be a epitaph for his own political career."

And not to be left out, John Coyne wrote in some magazine called National Review that "Reagan seems somewhat out of step with the new political stirrings, a man very much of the Sixties. . . For a decade he has been a central symbol of everything that is best in what we call the conservative movement, and if his approach and his ideas are obsolete, then so are those many of us who believe in him. And it’s never much fun to be a middle-aged anachronism." (NR) 
08-14-2008 at 1:40 PM
lilbit07
Not Ranked
Joined on 04-16-2006
Philly
28,997 Points
lilbit07 is not online. Last active: 07-04-2009, 10:48 AMBronze

Dear Congress,

 Vote NO to bad ideas!!!

Sincerely,

 lilbit

 
08-14-2008 at 2:49 PM
Mrs.Angele...
Not Ranked
Joined on 08-10-2006
Miami
54,202 Points
Mrs.Angeles is not online. Last active: 05-06-2009, 3:59 PMSilver

JulieF:
It's really dumb.  This came out a few weeks ago.  Obama proposed taxing the oil companies and giving $1000 each to every "working family."  Or every family, I am not sure which.

 so single ppl are SOL?




I finally got around to fixing Rocky's picture. 

search boards

choose another board

Stock Up:
Start Investing

4 Ways to
Keep Your Job

75+ Fab
Dining Rooms

Choose a market:
Financial Services

>> Joanna Giannoulis, Agent [Outer Boroughs]
The management of your finances, assets and family protection needs is an evolving

>> Katherine Wahlberg, CRPC | Ameriprise Financial Services Inc [Outer Boroughs]
Solid financial footing is one of the keys to a stress-free nest. Whether you hope

Banking & Mortgage Services

>> Mike Minicucci [Boston]

>> California Community Credit Union [Northern California]
We have been serving our community since 1939. Our service goes beyond savings and

>> See resources in another market

Gifts On SaleGifts For SiblingsGifts For ParentsGifts For BabyPersonalized Gifts